实际使用和意向使用商标申请

商标是保护品牌标识以及市场上品牌声誉的有力途径,但是申请商标保护并非易事。申请人往往面临各种考量因素,部分管辖区允许商标在尚未使用的情况下提交商标申请。

例如,若申请人有意,可向美国专利商标局(USPTO)可提交意向使用商标申请,但是这与实际使用申请有何不同?

 

意向使用商标申请

如申请人尚未但有意未来将其商标投入商业使用,可向USPTO提交意向使用(ITU)商标申请,不失为一种可行方案。申请人必须向USPTO提供所述意向证据,通常以使用声明或使用说明的形式。

但是,通过ITU申请提交的商标必须在投入商业使用后才可注册。因此,这类申请对于那些希望尽早(甚至可在实际使用商标之前)获得申请日的人来讲是一种不错的选择。因此,这使得该商标优先于潜在竞争对手的后续商标,这也是ITU申请的一大优势。对于那些仍处于业务发展阶段且未开始销售或宣传其商标和服务,但有意在未来进行相关业务的公司来讲,ITU申请尤为有用。

申请人需注意的是,通过ITU申请后,商标并不能立即获得保护。商标必须先投入商业使用,具体使用时间取决于申请的具体情况。

据USPTO相关规定,商业使用指带有该商标的商品/服务已在州际、地区或国外投入商业使用。例如,使用证明应包括商品外包装所印商标,且商品存在商业售卖或运输。就服务而言,商业使用包括相关服务的销售或宣传以及在商业中提供服务的证明。

ITU商标申请人可在以下三个阶段宣称商标已投入商业使用。第一个阶段是从ITU申请日起至商标审查员批准公布之日;第二个阶段是USPTO下发授权通知书之日起的6个月内。

如上述两者皆不可行,申请人可请求延长提交使用说明,最多5次,共可延长3年,需缴纳相应费用。如在上述期限内未及时提供使用说明,ITU申请将被撤销,相关商标可为他人所用。

 

实际使用商标申请

实际使用商标申请只能在商标已实际投入商业使用后才能提交。

如要提交实际使用商标申请,带有商标的商品或服务需已在商业中销售或宣传,与ITU申请的最终注册要求一致。需向USPTO提供上述使用证据,通常以带有商标的商品或服务样本或样品的形式。

申请通过后,商标将在USPTO注册,其公司对使用注册商标所列商品或服务享有专有权。

相比ITU申请,实际使用商标申请提供一个更为高效的商标保护途径,这是其一大优势。

在相关申请方面,其他管辖区也采取了与美国不用但类似的制度。邻国加拿大可基于“提议使用”提交商标申请,提供了比意向使用商标申请更为宽松的要求。

值得注意的是,商标法律法规因国家而异,较为复杂。如您有意提交商标申请或想了解更多意向使用商标申请,请点击此处联系我们。

《马德里议定书》VS《马德里协定》

谈到知识产权保护,有多项国际协定可加速全球的知识产权保护。如要在多个管辖区获得商标保护,可通过1891年签署的《商标国际注册马德里协定》以及1989年签署的《商标国际注册马德里协定有关议定书》。

两者相辅相成,构成了马德里商标国际注册体系,为在多个管辖区同时获得商标保护提供了一种更为高效的途径。因此,可提交指定的任何/所有马德里成员国的“国际”申请,后续的注册将在各个指定国单独生效,和单一国家申请一样。

《保护工业产权巴黎公约》成员国可同意并加入《马德里协议》和/或《马德里议定书》。各国需遵守其中一项或两项条约。

尽管《马德里协定》和《马德里议定书》相辅相成,性质相同,但是这两者作为独立的条约单独实施,因此具有若干固有差异。通过《马德里协定》或《马德里议定书》提交申请会在申请要求、预期期限以及官费等方面有所不同。

例如,《马德里协定》比《马德里议定书》早近100年,旨在为获得国际商标保护提供一种更为高效便捷的途径奠定基础,无须在各个管辖区单独提交申请。

但是,《马德里议定书》旨在为马德里体系提供更为灵活的方式。相关调整推动马德里体系与更多国家和政府间组织接轨,这些国家和组织此前基于其国内法无法加入《马德里协定》。此外,《马德里协定》仅允许单个国家加入,但是除此之外,《马德里议定书》还允许政府间组织加入。

涉及到商标申请和续展,这两项条约也有所不同。例如,《马德里协定》要求提交的国际申请基于一件本国商标注册。而《马德里议定书》要求国际申请可基于本国或“基础”商标申请,或在《马德里议定书》缔约国所在商标局注册的基础商标。

《马德里协定》还规定必须在原属国商标局提交国际申请且申请人在该国设有“真实有效的工商业营业场所”。如申请人无此类商业营业场所,则只能在其居住国提交申请。然而,《马德里议定书》允许申请人基于商业营业场所或居住国选择原属国商标局。

起初,《马德里协定》规定只能以法语提交申请,但是签署《马德里议定书》后,申请人可通过马德里体系以英语提交申请。在2004年,西班牙成为此体系的又一官方语言。这意味着,无论是通过《马德里协定》还是《马德里议定书》提交申请,申请人均可以三种官方语言之一提交国际申请。但是,各个原属国商标局可对使用这三种语言进行相关限制。

这两项条约在官费支付流程方面也有所不同。例如,《马德里协定》要求申请人为各个指定成员国缴纳固定费用,但自引入《马德里议定书》后,申请人可缴纳固定费用或马德里缔约国可选择单独计费模式。通过此计费模式,缔约国收取的国际申请费用将等同于单一国家申请费。

有关商标驳回期,《马德里协定》规定为12个月,而之后出台的《马德里议定书》规定为18个月,且可延长此期限。但是,如果原属国和指定国均为《马德里协定》和《马德里议定书》的缔约国,则根据《马德里议定书》第九条之六,商标临时驳回期限为12个月。

最后,《马德里协定》规定商标的有效期为20年,而《马德里议定书》规定的新有效期为10年。虽然有效期大大缩短,但是有助于清除登记簿中未使用或未续展的商标。

虽然《马德里协定》和《马德里议定书》各个方面有所不同,但是均为获得国际商标保护的有力途径。马德里联盟覆盖130个国家,拥有114个成员国,生动诠释了全球知识产权合作的意义所在。

什么是优先权?

什么是优先权?

 

优先权可说明该申请人为首位申请一项发明、外观设计或商标的人。如有需要,申请人需在国外申请时要求优先权。

 

要求优先权的期限?

 

自第一次提出申请之日起,申请人有“12个月(发明和实用新型)和6个月(外观设计和商标)”(《巴黎公约》第4条)采取下一步行动。

 

为什么要求优先权?

 

专利局会根据优先权日来决定您的发明是否符合新颖性的要求(见新颖性帖子)。如您未要求优先权,所有已知信息(包括您的第一次申请,如已公开)均会成为现有技术的一部分,那么您的发明将不再视为新的或新颖的。

 

总之,要求优先权可保护想要在多国获得知识产权保护的申请人的权利。

是否需要进行专利和商标检索

搜索知识产权保护相关信息时,您可能会看到专利和商标检索等术语,但是您清楚这是强制性的还是建议性的,以及由谁来进行这类检索?

可专利检索又称之为现有技术、专利或新颖性检索。进行这类检索是为了查找同一发明是否已被他人公开或是否存在近似发明。可专利性检索并非强制,通常在撰写专利申请时进行。此外,在审查您的申请时,专利局也会进行这类检索。

商标检索有助于确定同一商标是否已注册。在大多数国家,申请前进行商标检索并非强制,但是需要注意的是,在很多国家,商标检索为审查程序的一部分。

但是您如何清楚自己是否需要进行检索?专利检索的结果有助于您决定您的发明是否值得申请专利、评估专利授权的成功率以及为可能下发的审查意见准备答复。

对于商标而言,好处也非常多;您可以避免不必要的侵权,申请前便可考虑您的后续行为以及发现会提出异议的潜在竞争对手。

如进行检索,建议您寻求专业商标或专利代理人的帮助。

Understanding trademarks

Trademarks are at the epicentre of both intellectual property and our daily lives, with brand names emblazoned into every moment of our day-to-day activities. From our morning cereal to TV adverts, right down to the toothpaste we use and the bottled water we drink, trademarks are everywhere, so let’s take a look at the particulars of this type of IP, and provide an overview of what can and cannot be registered.

Trademarks are used to identify and distinguish a company's products and/or services from those of its competitors. The most common types of trademarks are word, figurative, and combination marks, but may also comprise sounds, smells, 3D models, colours, or logos, depending on the allowances of the jurisdiction.

Trademarks themselves are registered for specific goods and/or services which, for many countries, are classified in the Nice Classification of Goods and Services. This is an international classification established by the Nice Agreement of 1957 and revised each year, presently utilized by approximately 150 IP offices including the regional offices of EUIPO, OAPI, ARIPO, and BOIP. At present, there are 34 possible classes of goods, and 11 classes of services for which a trademark can be registered.

In general, trademarks must be distinctive in order to be registered. In some countries such as the UK, however, it may be possible to register a non-distinct mark, provided that prior to the date of registration, it acquired a distinctive character as a result of its use. Distinctiveness in the US has experienced some overhaul when it comes to non traditional trademarks, whereby court rulings have found that marks in relation to sound and product packaging are capable of being inherently distinctive, whilst product design, scent, colour and taste are not. Those not inherently distinctive must therefore provide evidence of a secondary meaning, or acquired distinctiveness, in order to be registrable and protected under US courts.

Trademarks that cannot be registered usually include those which are misleading (if it uses the word 'organic' for a product that is not) or descriptive if a mark describes the goods or services to which it will relate. Furthermore, marks that contain internet domain names, aspects that are deemed offensive such as swear words or inappropriate images, as well as those similar to state symbols and other official signs, emblems subject to protection under an international agreement, abbreviations and names of international intergovernmental organizations, are not registrable in most jurisdictions.

Trademarks can vary in terms of their strength of protection, for example, a strong mark in accordance with US trademark law would be a 'fanciful or coined' mark. These marks are inherently distinctive as they constitute invented or sometimes archaic words that bear little, or no, resemblance to the goods or services provided, such as 'Pepsi'. Another type of strong trademark is the arbitrary mark, consisting of words or symbols that have common meaning in the jurisdiction of registration, but are unrelated to the good or service, such as ‘Apple’ for computers. Weaker marks include suggestive marks such as 'Netflix', which make some reference to the subject matter of the mark.

Please note that the aforementioned examples of trademark requirements and strength of protection are largely based on UK and US law, and will differ in each jurisdiction. For more information on trademark registration, please contact us.

Trademark opposition

One of the key parts of the procedure for the registration of a trademark is the possibility of oppositions to an application.

A trademark opposition is a formal objection, filed by a third party, against the registration of a mark. National and regional trademark laws outline the procedures for the opposition process in each jurisdiction, including the particulars such as opposition terms, documents etc. In many jurisdictions, a trademark application is published once it has been accepted and deemed as registrable by the trademark office. Thereafter, third parties may object to the registration of the mark during a defined period of time on the basis of grounds set forth by the relevant trademark law. This period is otherwise known as the Opposition Period.

There are 2 types of opposition grounds - absolute and relative. Absolute grounds encompass issues with the trademark itself, such as if the mark is not distinctive, is descriptive of the goods/services covered by the mark, or is generic in nature in relation to the goods or services.

Relative grounds rely on the basis that an earlier trademark right exists, and the applied-for trademark conflicts with said earlier right, for example, if it is confusingly similar, or takes advantage of a previous mark’s reputation.

Should an opposition be filed against the registration of a mark, the relevant IPO will typically make an applicant aware of the opposition, and will set a deadline for which a response may be filed. This response will usually comprise either a Notice of Defence and a counterstatement with arguments to defend the application in full, withdrawal of the application, or limiting of the goods or services. This stage may continue to both parties filing further submissions in support of their side, and the IPO will form a decision based upon said submissions. In some jurisdictions, the parties may elect to have the matter heard at a hearing.

One possible outcome is that the opposition is rejected by the IPO. In this instance, the trademark application may then proceed to be registered without issue.

Should an opposition be accepted fully, the trademark application shall be considered withdrawn, and thus will not be registered.

If, on the other hand, the opposition is accepted partially, the trademark applicant may be obliged to amend their mark in accordance with the decision, for example, reducing the list of goods and/or services in the application which were subject to the opposition.

Alternatively, it may be possible to negotiate an amicable solution with the opposing party in order for the application to continue to registration without the need for the matter to be decided by the IPO.

Considering the complex nature of trademark oppositions, it is important for both applicants and potential opposing parties to be aware of all particulars of the trademark opposition procedure. If you have any questions regarding the trademark opposition process, or require the assistance of a trademark attorney, feel free to contact us.

12